Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0043 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0001 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
121st
Singapore rank
122nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Singapore
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0043 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Singapore, a difference of 0.0042 1000 USD per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 48.5 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 122nd of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0108 1000 USD per person 0.1124 1000 USD per person 0.1016 1000 USD per person Singapore
1970s 0.0147 1000 USD per person 0.2061 1000 USD per person 0.1914 1000 USD per person Singapore
1980s 0.0143 1000 USD per person 0.1702 1000 USD per person 0.1559 1000 USD per person Singapore
1990s 0.0118 1000 USD per person 0.0395 1000 USD per person 0.0277 1000 USD per person Singapore
2000s 0.0085 1000 USD per person 0.0008 1000 USD per person 0.0077 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0054 1000 USD per person 0.0011 1000 USD per person 0.0042 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0041 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person 0.0033 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or Singapore?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0043 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
0.0042 1000 USD per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Singapore rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st and Singapore ranks 122nd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/">Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.