How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Morocco?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Morocco: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo

0.096 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Morocco

0.0923 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Congo rank

59th

Morocco rank

60th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Congo
Morocco

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.096 1000 USD per person against 0.0923 1000 USD per person in Morocco, a difference of 0.0037 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 59th and Morocco ranks 60th of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Morocco in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0822 1000 USD per person	0.0653 1000 USD per person	0.017 1000 USD per person	Congo
1970s	0.075 1000 USD per person	0.061 1000 USD per person	0.0141 1000 USD per person	Congo
1980s	0.0741 1000 USD per person	0.0628 1000 USD per person	0.0113 1000 USD per person	Congo
1990s	0.0682 1000 USD per person	0.072 1000 USD per person	0.0039 1000 USD per person	Morocco
2000s	0.0864 1000 USD per person	0.0811 1000 USD per person	0.0054 1000 USD per person	Congo
2010s	0.1106 1000 USD per person	0.1064 1000 USD per person	0.0042 1000 USD per person	Congo
2020s	0.0986 1000 USD per person	0.1053 1000 USD per person	0.0067 1000 USD per person	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Morocco?: Congo, at 0.096 1000 USD per person against 0.0923 1000 USD per person in Morocco as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Morocco?: 0.0037 1000 USD per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Morocco?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Morocco rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Congo ranks 59th and Morocco ranks 60th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Morocco: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/morocco/">Congo vs Morocco: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.