How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Malawi: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo

0.096 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malawi

0.0993 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Congo rank

59th

Malawi rank

57th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Congo
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0993 1000 USD per person against 0.096 1000 USD per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0033 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 57th of 123 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0822 1000 USD per person	0.0127 1000 USD per person	0.0696 1000 USD per person	Congo
1970s	0.075 1000 USD per person	0.0168 1000 USD per person	0.0582 1000 USD per person	Congo
1980s	0.0741 1000 USD per person	0.0172 1000 USD per person	0.057 1000 USD per person	Congo
1990s	0.0692 1000 USD per person	0.0171 1000 USD per person	0.0521 1000 USD per person	Congo
2000s	0.0864 1000 USD per person	0.0186 1000 USD per person	0.0678 1000 USD per person	Congo
2010s	0.1106 1000 USD per person	0.0617 1000 USD per person	0.0489 1000 USD per person	Congo
2020s	0.0986 1000 USD per person	0.0926 1000 USD per person	0.0059 1000 USD per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.0993 1000 USD per person against 0.096 1000 USD per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Malawi?: 0.0033 1000 USD per person, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Malawi rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Congo ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 57th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malawi: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/congo-rep/malawi/">Congo vs Malawi: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.