How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Peru: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile

0.1737 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Peru

0.1768 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chile rank

33rd

Peru rank

31st

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chile
Peru

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.1768 1000 USD per person against 0.1737 1000 USD per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0031 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 123 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0767 1000 USD per person	0.0556 1000 USD per person	0.0211 1000 USD per person	Chile
1970s	0.0791 1000 USD per person	0.0576 1000 USD per person	0.0216 1000 USD per person	Chile
1980s	0.0936 1000 USD per person	0.0619 1000 USD per person	0.0317 1000 USD per person	Chile
1990s	0.1301 1000 USD per person	0.0676 1000 USD per person	0.0624 1000 USD per person	Chile
2000s	0.1679 1000 USD per person	0.0944 1000 USD per person	0.0735 1000 USD per person	Chile
2010s	0.1791 1000 USD per person	0.1488 1000 USD per person	0.0303 1000 USD per person	Chile
2020s	0.1762 1000 USD per person	0.1721 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Peru?: Peru, at 0.1768 1000 USD per person against 0.1737 1000 USD per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Peru?: 0.0031 1000 USD per person, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Peru rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chile ranks 33rd and Peru ranks 31st of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Peru: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/peru/">Chile vs Peru: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.