How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hungary?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile

0.1737 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Hungary

0.1768 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chile rank

33rd

Hungary rank

32nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chile
Hungary

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.1768 1000 USD per person against 0.1737 1000 USD per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0031 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Chile ranks 33rd and Hungary ranks 32nd of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Hungary	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0767 1000 USD per person	0.1552 1000 USD per person	0.0785 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1970s	0.0791 1000 USD per person	0.2129 1000 USD per person	0.1338 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1980s	0.0936 1000 USD per person	0.2716 1000 USD per person	0.178 1000 USD per person	Hungary
1990s	0.1301 1000 USD per person	0.2076 1000 USD per person	0.0775 1000 USD per person	Hungary
2000s	0.1679 1000 USD per person	0.1747 1000 USD per person	0.0068 1000 USD per person	Hungary
2010s	0.1791 1000 USD per person	0.157 1000 USD per person	0.0221 1000 USD per person	Chile
2020s	0.1762 1000 USD per person	0.1726 1000 USD per person	0.0036 1000 USD per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Hungary?: Hungary, at 0.1768 1000 USD per person against 0.1737 1000 USD per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Hungary?: 0.0031 1000 USD per person, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hungary?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Hungary rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chile ranks 33rd and Hungary ranks 32nd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/hungary/">Chile vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.