Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bangladesh
0.0063 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0.0043 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
120th
Equatorial Guinea rank
121st

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.0063 1000 USD per person against 0.0043 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.002 1000 USD per person.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 120th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0044 1000 USD per person 0.0108 1000 USD per person 0.0063 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0043 1000 USD per person 0.0147 1000 USD per person 0.0104 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0033 1000 USD per person 0.0143 1000 USD per person 0.0109 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0042 1000 USD per person 0.0118 1000 USD per person 0.0075 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0049 1000 USD per person 0.0085 1000 USD per person 0.0036 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0058 1000 USD per person 0.0054 1000 USD per person 0.0004 1000 USD per person Bangladesh
2020s 0.0063 1000 USD per person 0.0041 1000 USD per person 0.0022 1000 USD per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
Bangladesh, at 0.0063 1000 USD per person against 0.0043 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
0.002 1000 USD per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bangladesh ranks 120th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 121st of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/">Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.