Chile vs Serbia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
1.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia
1.55 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chile rank
72nd
Serbia rank
70th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia
-250255075196219932024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1.55 % change on previous year against 1.35 % change on previous year in Chile, a difference of 0.2 % change on previous year.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Chile ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 70th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s -0.1831 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Serbia
2010s 0.9861 % change on previous year 0.5385 % change on previous year 0.4475 % change on previous year Chile
2020s 0.4082 % change on previous year 0.8626 % change on previous year 0.4544 % change on previous year Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1.55 % change on previous year against 1.35 % change on previous year in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Serbia?
0.2 % change on previous year, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 70th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth/chile/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth/chile/serbia/">Chile vs Serbia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 10,025 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.