Panama vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Panama
10.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
55th
Uganda rank
57th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Panama
  • Uganda
246810196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 10.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Panama ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 171 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 2.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 4.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 5.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 6.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 9.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 9.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Panama or Uganda?
Panama, at 10.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Panama and Uganda?
0.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Uganda rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Panama ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/panama/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/panama/uganda/">Panama vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.