Mexico vs Tuvalu: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mexico
10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
12.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
52nd
Tuvalu rank
49th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mexico
  • Tuvalu
2.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 12.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Mexico ranks 52nd and Tuvalu ranks 49th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1970s 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 4.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 5.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 7.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 8.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mexico or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 12.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mexico and Tuvalu?
1.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Tuvalu rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mexico ranks 52nd and Tuvalu ranks 49th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Tuvalu: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mexico/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mexico/tuvalu/">Mexico vs Tuvalu: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.