Malta vs Mauritius: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malta
70.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
58.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
6th
Mauritius rank
7th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malta
  • Mauritius
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 70.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 58.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 11.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 6th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 171 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 35.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 60.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 55.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 76.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 66.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 108.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 88.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 110.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 75.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 76.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 47.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 70.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 52.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malta or Mauritius?
Malta, at 70.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 58.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malta and Mauritius?
11.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Mauritius rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malta ranks 6th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritius: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malta/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malta/mauritius/">Malta vs Mauritius: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.