Malawi vs Uruguay: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
18.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
16.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
33rd
Uruguay rank
35th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • Uruguay
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 18.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 16.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Malawi ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 35th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.8484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 1.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 2.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 8.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 16.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Uruguay?
Malawi, at 18.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 16.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Uruguay?
2.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uruguay?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Uruguay rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 35th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uruguay: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/uruguay/">Malawi vs Uruguay: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.