Iceland vs Liberia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.9856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
0.846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
149th
Liberia rank
150th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Liberia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.9856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.1396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 150th of 171 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5809 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.8596 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.557 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.8748 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4642 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.7035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.8553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Liberia?
Iceland, at 0.9856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Liberia?
0.1396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Liberia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 150th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Liberia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/liberia/">Iceland vs Liberia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.