Ecuador vs Mexico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
54th
Mexico rank
52nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Ecuador ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 52nd of 171 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 6.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 8.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 9.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Mexico?
Mexico, at 10.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Mexico?
0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 52nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mexico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/mexico/">Ecuador vs Mexico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.