Ecuador vs Malaysia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
10.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
54th
Malaysia rank
53rd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 10.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 54th and Malaysia ranks 53rd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7843 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2887 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2811 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 6.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6906 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 8.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 9.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 10.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 10.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Malaysia?
0.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 54th and Malaysia ranks 53rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.