Denmark vs Israel: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Denmark
84.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
94.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
5th
Israel rank
3rd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Denmark
  • Israel
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 94.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 84.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 10.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 5th and Israel ranks 3rd of 171 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 57.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 48.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 66.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 49.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 84.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 61.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 101.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 68.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 110.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 61.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 48.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 101.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 78.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 97.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 88.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Denmark or Israel?
Israel, at 94.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 84.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Denmark and Israel?
10.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Israel rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Denmark ranks 5th and Israel ranks 3rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Israel: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/denmark/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/denmark/israel/">Denmark vs Israel: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.