Congo vs Niger: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.6293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
162nd
Niger rank
160th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Niger
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.6293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.1285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Niger ahead.

Congo ranks 162nd and Niger ranks 160th of 171 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Niger Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1970s 0.101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3423 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2413 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1980s 0.1357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.447 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
1990s 0.1673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5717 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2000s 0.2844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2010s 0.4744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger
2020s 0.4912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Niger?
Niger, at 0.6293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Niger?
0.1285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Niger?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Niger rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 162nd and Niger ranks 160th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Niger: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/niger/">Congo vs Niger: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.