Congo vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.3787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
162nd
Namibia rank
165th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.1221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Congo ranks 162nd and Namibia ranks 165th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.1357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.1673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.2844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3657 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0814 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.4744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.4912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 0.5008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Namibia?
0.1221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 162nd and Namibia ranks 165th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.