Chile vs Kiribati: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
5.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
92nd
Kiribati rank
89th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Kiribati
12345196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 5.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Chile ranks 92nd and Kiribati ranks 89th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5759 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 4.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2487 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 5.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Kiribati?
0.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Kiribati rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 92nd and Kiribati ranks 89th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kiribati: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/kiribati/">Chile vs Kiribati: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.