Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bulgaria
4.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bulgaria rank
94th
Chile rank
92nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Chile
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 94th and Chile ranks 92nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 6 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 9.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
1970s 13.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
1980s 17.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
1990s 13.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2000s 5.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2010s 4.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bulgaria
2020s 4.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bulgaria or Chile?
Chile, at 4.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bulgaria as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bulgaria and Chile?
0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Chile?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Chile rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bulgaria ranks 94th and Chile ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bulgaria/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bulgaria/chile/">Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.