Brazil vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Brazil
9.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
59th
Uganda rank
57th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Brazil
  • Uganda
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Brazil ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 57th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 2.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 3.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 5.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4566 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 7.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 8.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Brazil or Uganda?
Uganda, at 9.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 9.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Brazil and Uganda?
0.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Uganda rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Brazil ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 57th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/brazil/uganda/">Brazil vs Uganda: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.