Bangladesh vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bangladesh
21.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary
21.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
24th
Hungary rank
25th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Hungary
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 21.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 21.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 25th of 171 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 6.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 7.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 11.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 14.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 18.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 21.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bangladesh or Hungary?
Bangladesh, at 21.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 21.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bangladesh and Hungary?
0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Hungary?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Hungary rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bangladesh ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 25th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bangladesh/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bangladesh/hungary/">Bangladesh vs Hungary: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.