Argentina vs Romania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Argentina
7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
7.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
74th
Romania rank
76th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Argentina
  • Romania
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Argentina ranks 74th and Romania ranks 76th of 171 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 4.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1970s 4.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1980s 4.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
1990s 5.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 5.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 6.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 7.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Argentina or Romania?
Argentina, at 7.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Argentina and Romania?
0.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Romania rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Argentina ranks 74th and Romania ranks 76th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Romania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/argentina/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/argentina/romania/">Argentina vs Romania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.