Nauru vs Solomon Islands: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Nauru
0.0131 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0.0109 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Nauru rank
159th
Solomon Islands rank
161st

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Nauru
  • Solomon Islands
0.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.0131 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0109 1000 Int$ per person in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0022 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Nauru ranks 159th and Solomon Islands ranks 161st of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.009 1000 Int$ per person 0.0171 1000 Int$ per person 0.0081 1000 Int$ per person Solomon Islands
1970s 0.01 1000 Int$ per person 0.0273 1000 Int$ per person 0.0174 1000 Int$ per person Solomon Islands
1980s 0.0123 1000 Int$ per person 0.024 1000 Int$ per person 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person Solomon Islands
1990s 0.014 1000 Int$ per person 0.0185 1000 Int$ per person 0.0044 1000 Int$ per person Solomon Islands
2000s 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person 0.0167 1000 Int$ per person 0.0021 1000 Int$ per person Solomon Islands
2010s 0.0143 1000 Int$ per person 0.0139 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Nauru
2020s 0.0131 1000 Int$ per person 0.0114 1000 Int$ per person 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Nauru or Solomon Islands?
Nauru, at 0.0131 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0109 1000 Int$ per person in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Nauru and Solomon Islands?
0.0022 1000 Int$ per person, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Solomon Islands?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Nauru and Solomon Islands rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Nauru ranks 159th and Solomon Islands ranks 161st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Solomon Islands: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/naoero/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/naoero/solomon-islands/">Nauru vs Solomon Islands: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,962 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.