Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0009 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Singapore
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
170th
Singapore rank
171st

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Singapore
00.050.10.15196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Singapore, a difference of 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 22.6 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 171st of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person 0.0582 1000 Int$ per person 0.0556 1000 Int$ per person Singapore
1970s 0.0033 1000 Int$ per person 0.109 1000 Int$ per person 0.1058 1000 Int$ per person Singapore
1980s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person 0.0933 1000 Int$ per person 0.0902 1000 Int$ per person Singapore
1990s 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0193 1000 Int$ per person 0.0168 1000 Int$ per person Singapore
2000s 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0006 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Equatorial Guinea or Singapore?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
0.0009 1000 Int$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Singapore rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 171st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/">Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,962 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.