Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
17.78 % change on previous year
in 2024
Puerto Rico
17.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
5th
Puerto Rico rank
6th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
-20020196219932024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 17.78 % change on previous year against 17.2 % change on previous year in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.58 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 5th and Puerto Rico ranks 6th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.707 % change on previous year 3.69 % change on previous year 2.98 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
1970s 3.96 % change on previous year 5.52 % change on previous year 1.56 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
1980s -0.8976 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year 2.24 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
1990s -2.15 % change on previous year -1.91 % change on previous year 0.2405 % change on previous year Puerto Rico
2000s 6.05 % change on previous year -1.86 % change on previous year 7.91 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s -0.6179 % change on previous year -4.28 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 6.31 % change on previous year -3.89 % change on previous year 10.2 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Eswatini, at 17.78 % change on previous year against 17.2 % change on previous year in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
0.58 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 5th and Puerto Rico ranks 6th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 13,885 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.