Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Djibouti
0.5936 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.5282 % change on previous year
in 2024
Djibouti rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Djibouti
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300400196219932024

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0.5936 % change on previous year against 0.5282 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0654 % change on previous year.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 214 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.22 % change on previous year 3.06 % change on previous year 1.16 % change on previous year Djibouti
1970s 3.51 % change on previous year 4.59 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 1.49 % change on previous year -0.2364 % change on previous year 1.72 % change on previous year Djibouti
1990s 4.05 % change on previous year 41.24 % change on previous year 37.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 4.31 % change on previous year -1.29 % change on previous year 5.61 % change on previous year Djibouti
2010s 2.71 % change on previous year 0.4544 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year Djibouti
2020s 0.6837 % change on previous year 3.18 % change on previous year 2.49 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Djibouti or Zimbabwe?
Djibouti, at 0.5936 % change on previous year against 0.5282 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
0.0654 % change on previous year, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Djibouti and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Djibouti ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/djibouti/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/djibouti/zimbabwe/">Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 13,885 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.