China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China, Hong Kong SAR
-0.1465 % change on previous year
in 2024
Lithuania
-0.0951 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
129th
Lithuania rank
128th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Lithuania
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -0.0951 % change on previous year against -0.1465 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0514 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 129th and Lithuania ranks 128th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 8.14 % change on previous year -10.99 % change on previous year 19.14 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 2.67 % change on previous year -1.64 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 10.77 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year 9.07 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s -5.2 % change on previous year -1.18 % change on previous year 4.02 % change on previous year Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China, Hong Kong SAR or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -0.0951 % change on previous year against -0.1465 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
0.0514 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 129th and Lithuania ranks 128th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 13,885 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.