China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
China, Hong Kong SAR
-0.1465 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
-0.1575 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
129th
Latvia rank
131st
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -0.1465 % change on previous year against -0.1575 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.011 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 131st of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.14 % change on previous year | -17.91 % change on previous year | 26.06 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 2.67 % change on previous year | 2.18 % change on previous year | 0.4869 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 10.77 % change on previous year | 0.6406 % change on previous year | 10.13 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | -5.2 % change on previous year | -0.3944 % change on previous year | 4.8 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -0.1465 % change on previous year against -0.1575 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 0.011 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 131st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.