Chile vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
1.21 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
1.17 % change on previous year
in 2005
Chile rank
91st
Serbia and Montenegro rank
93rd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia and Montenegro
-250255075196219932024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.21 % change on previous year against 1.17 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 91st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 93rd of 214 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 5.19 % change on previous year 0.4777 % change on previous year 4.71 % change on previous year Chile
2000s 3.86 % change on previous year -2.29 % change on previous year 6.15 % change on previous year Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Serbia and Montenegro?
Chile, at 1.21 % change on previous year against 1.17 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Serbia and Montenegro?
0.04 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia and Montenegro?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Chile and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 91st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 93rd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/chile/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth/chile/serbia-and-montenegro/">Chile vs Serbia and Montenegro: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 13,885 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.