Australia and New Zealand vs Tokelau: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
Australia and New Zealand
9.44 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tokelau
9.9 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
21st
Tokelau rank
20th
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Tokelau
How they compare
Tokelau currently reports 9.9 % change on previous year against 9.44 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.46 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Tokelau ranks 20th of 214 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Tokelau in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.65 % change on previous year | 23.35 % change on previous year | 19.69 % change on previous year | Tokelau |
| 1970s | 3.63 % change on previous year | 2.73 % change on previous year | 0.8966 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -0.3381 % change on previous year | 2.3 % change on previous year | 2.63 % change on previous year | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 1.66 % change on previous year | -0.4 % change on previous year | 2.06 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.7989 % change on previous year | 0.0459 % change on previous year | 0.753 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.48 % change on previous year | 5.32 % change on previous year | 3.84 % change on previous year | Tokelau |
| 2020s | 2.31 % change on previous year | 8.72 % change on previous year | 6.41 % change on previous year | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia and New Zealand or Tokelau?
- Tokelau, at 9.9 % change on previous year against 9.44 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and New Zealand and Tokelau?
- 0.46 % change on previous year, with Tokelau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Tokelau?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Tokelau rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Tokelau ranks 20th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.