Tanzania, United Republic of vs Yemen: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita

Tanzania, United Republic of
12.17 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Yemen
13.72 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
173rd
Yemen rank
171st

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Yemen
57.51012.51517.5196119922023

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 13.72 kilograms per year per capita against 12.17 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.55 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 173rd and Yemen ranks 171st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 3 and Yemen in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Yemen Difference Ahead
1960s 9.93 kilograms per year per capita 7.8 kilograms per year per capita 2.13 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 10.03 kilograms per year per capita 7.46 kilograms per year per capita 2.57 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 9.97 kilograms per year per capita 12.65 kilograms per year per capita 2.67 kilograms per year per capita Yemen
1990s 10.23 kilograms per year per capita 9.8 kilograms per year per capita 0.4276 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 8.73 kilograms per year per capita 14.29 kilograms per year per capita 5.56 kilograms per year per capita Yemen
2010s 10.09 kilograms per year per capita 15.42 kilograms per year per capita 5.33 kilograms per year per capita Yemen
2020s 12.19 kilograms per year per capita 14.94 kilograms per year per capita 2.76 kilograms per year per capita Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Tanzania, United Republic of or Yemen?
Yemen, at 13.72 kilograms per year per capita against 12.17 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen?
1.55 kilograms per year per capita, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Yemen rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 173rd and Yemen ranks 171st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Yemen: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/tanzania/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/tanzania/yemen-rep/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Yemen: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.