New Caledonia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita

New Caledonia
89.59 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
88.84 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
31st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
32nd

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
20406080100196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 89.59 kilograms per year per capita against 88.84 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.75 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 31st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 50.93 kilograms per year per capita 18.59 kilograms per year per capita 32.34 kilograms per year per capita New Caledonia
1970s 60.07 kilograms per year per capita 31.14 kilograms per year per capita 28.93 kilograms per year per capita New Caledonia
1980s 53.23 kilograms per year per capita 55.35 kilograms per year per capita 2.13 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 62.88 kilograms per year per capita 68.95 kilograms per year per capita 6.07 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 66.32 kilograms per year per capita 81.9 kilograms per year per capita 15.58 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 78.31 kilograms per year per capita 92.51 kilograms per year per capita 14.2 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 87.45 kilograms per year per capita 93.17 kilograms per year per capita 5.72 kilograms per year per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, New Caledonia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
New Caledonia, at 89.59 kilograms per year per capita against 88.84 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between New Caledonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.75 kilograms per year per capita, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 31st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 32nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/new-caledonia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/new-caledonia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">New Caledonia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.