Liberia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita

Liberia
12.32 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
12.17 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Liberia rank
172nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
173rd

Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Liberia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 12.32 kilograms per year per capita against 12.17 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.15 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 172nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 173rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 9.9 kilograms per year per capita 9.93 kilograms per year per capita 0.0301 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 10.22 kilograms per year per capita 10.03 kilograms per year per capita 0.1834 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1980s 11.92 kilograms per year per capita 9.97 kilograms per year per capita 1.95 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1990s 10.13 kilograms per year per capita 10.23 kilograms per year per capita 0.0979 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 9.51 kilograms per year per capita 8.73 kilograms per year per capita 0.7789 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2010s 17.26 kilograms per year per capita 10.09 kilograms per year per capita 7.17 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2020s 15.69 kilograms per year per capita 12.19 kilograms per year per capita 3.5 kilograms per year per capita Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Liberia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Liberia, at 12.32 kilograms per year per capita against 12.17 kilograms per year per capita in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Liberia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.15 kilograms per year per capita, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
Liberia ranks 172nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 173rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/liberia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-consumption-vs-gdp-per-capita/liberia/tanzania/">Liberia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.