Comoros vs Paraguay: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Comoros
26.59 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Paraguay
26.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
141st
Paraguay rank
140th
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time
- Comoros
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 26.94 kilograms per year per capita against 26.59 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros, a difference of 0.35 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 141st and Paraguay ranks 140th of 192 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.58 kilograms per year per capita | 35.34 kilograms per year per capita | 14.76 kilograms per year per capita | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 28 kilograms per year per capita | 34.96 kilograms per year per capita | 6.96 kilograms per year per capita | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Comoros or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 26.94 kilograms per year per capita against 26.59 kilograms per year per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Comoros and Paraguay?
- 0.35 kilograms per year per capita, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Paraguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Paraguay rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Comoros ranks 141st and Paraguay ranks 140th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.