Bhutan vs Nepal: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Bhutan
14.66 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nepal
14.48 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
166th
Nepal rank
167th
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Nepal
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 14.66 kilograms per year per capita against 14.48 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal, a difference of 0.18 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Nepal ahead.
Bhutan ranks 166th and Nepal ranks 167th of 192 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.29 kilograms per year per capita | 16.6 kilograms per year per capita | 1.31 kilograms per year per capita | Nepal |
| 2020s | 13.93 kilograms per year per capita | 17.12 kilograms per year per capita | 3.19 kilograms per year per capita | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Bhutan or Nepal?
- Bhutan, at 14.66 kilograms per year per capita against 14.48 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Bhutan and Nepal?
- 0.18 kilograms per year per capita, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Nepal rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 166th and Nepal ranks 167th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.