Bolivia vs Madagascar: Corn: Yield gap
Bolivia
3.1 tonnes per hectare
in 2024
Madagascar
3.19 tonnes per hectare
in 2024
Bolivia rank
31st
Madagascar rank
29th
Corn: Yield gap over time
- Bolivia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 3.19 tonnes per hectare against 3.1 tonnes per hectare in Bolivia, a difference of 0.09 tonnes per hectare.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Madagascar ahead.
Bolivia ranks 31st and Madagascar ranks 29th of 115 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.37 tonnes per hectare | 3.61 tonnes per hectare | 0.2367 tonnes per hectare | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 3.19 tonnes per hectare | 3.34 tonnes per hectare | 0.1531 tonnes per hectare | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 3.08 tonnes per hectare | 3.21 tonnes per hectare | 0.1288 tonnes per hectare | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher corn: yield gap, Bolivia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 3.19 tonnes per hectare against 3.1 tonnes per hectare in Bolivia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in corn: yield gap between Bolivia and Madagascar?
- 0.09 tonnes per hectare, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Madagascar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bolivia and Madagascar rank globally for corn: yield gap?
- Bolivia ranks 31st and Madagascar ranks 29th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mueller et al. (2012); USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2026); Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Corn: Yield gap. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Yield gaps are the difference between attainable yields and actual yields, measured in tonnes per hectare. Negative values have been replaced by zero, meaning that the attainable yield has been reached.