Luxembourg vs Oman: Maize (corn) — Production, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Oman
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
136th
Oman rank
134th
Maize (corn) — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 136th and Oman ranks 134th of 149 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Oman |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Oman |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize (corn) — production, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Oman?
- Oman, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in maize (corn) — production, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Oman?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Oman?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Oman rank globally for maize (corn) — production, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 136th and Oman ranks 134th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Maize (corn) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.