Burundi vs China: Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Burundi
9.07 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China
11.68 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
7th
China rank
4th

Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Burundi
  • China
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 11.68 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 2.61 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 7th and China ranks 4th of 119 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and China in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi China Difference Ahead
1960s 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9826 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6352 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 2.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2213 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.477 1000 USD per square kilometre China
1990s 2.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.16 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2000s 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2010s 2.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.53 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2020s 9.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.08 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Burundi or China?
China, at 11.68 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Burundi and China?
2.61 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and China rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Burundi ranks 7th and China ranks 4th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs China: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/china/">Burundi vs China: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
120 places, 6,464 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.