Bhutan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US

Bhutan
0.3119 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.2577 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2003
Bhutan rank
81st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
83rd

Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre US over time

  • Bhutan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.3119 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2577 1000 USD per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 119 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5496 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1941 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3555 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.7019 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.309 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.393 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.6723 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2638 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4084 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.7093 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3397 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3696 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.5938 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.197 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3967 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bhutan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Bhutan, at 0.3119 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2577 1000 USD per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
43 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2003.
How do Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bhutan ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Bhutan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
120 places, 6,464 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.