How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Nepal: Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US

Angola

0.0289 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0288 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Angola rank

29th

Nepal rank

30th

Maize (corn): Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita US over time

Angola
Nepal

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0289 1000 USD per person against 0.0288 1000 USD per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 30th of 119 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0254 1000 USD per person	0.0197 1000 USD per person	0.0058 1000 USD per person	Angola
1970s	0.0198 1000 USD per person	0.015 1000 USD per person	0.0048 1000 USD per person	Angola
1980s	0.0093 1000 USD per person	0.0134 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	Nepal
1990s	0.0076 1000 USD per person	0.0157 1000 USD per person	0.0082 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2000s	0.0104 1000 USD per person	0.0171 1000 USD per person	0.0067 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2010s	0.0208 1000 USD per person	0.0215 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	Nepal
2020s	0.0286 1000 USD per person	0.0274 1000 USD per person	0.0012 1000 USD per person	Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Angola or Nepal?: Angola, at 0.0289 1000 USD per person against 0.0288 1000 USD per person in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Angola and Nepal?: 0.0001 1000 USD per person, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Angola and Nepal rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Angola ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 30th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nepal: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/angola/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/angola/nepal/">Angola vs Nepal: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 120 places, 6,562 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 06 October 2026

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.