New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

New Caledonia
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Zealand
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
103rd
New Zealand rank
100th

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • New Caledonia
  • New Zealand
0000196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 103rd and New Zealand ranks 100th of 143 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), New Caledonia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between New Caledonia and New Zealand?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and New Zealand?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and New Zealand rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
New Caledonia ranks 103rd and New Zealand ranks 100th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/new-zealand/">New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
144 places, 7,444 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.