Guatemala vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guatemala
3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
21st
Rwanda rank
18th

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Rwanda
0246196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 18th of 145 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5395 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 2.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 2.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 3.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 3.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guatemala or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guatemala and Rwanda?
0.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guatemala ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 18th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/">Guatemala vs Rwanda: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 7,843 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.