Cuba vs Panama: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cuba
0.2899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.2546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
82nd
Panama rank
85th

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cuba
  • Panama
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.2899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Cuba ranks 82nd and Panama ranks 85th of 145 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1697 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.1712 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1638 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.1748 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.2273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.6228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.7069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0818 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cuba or Panama?
Cuba, at 0.2899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cuba and Panama?
0.0353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Panama rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cuba ranks 82nd and Panama ranks 85th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Panama: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/panama/">Cuba vs Panama: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 7,843 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.