Chile vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
93rd
New Zealand rank
94th

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 93rd and New Zealand ranks 94th of 145 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0842 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.1698 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1212 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0486 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.2356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.3129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.3474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.1715 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1487 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or New Zealand?
Chile, at 0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and New Zealand?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for maize (corn) — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 93rd and New Zealand ranks 94th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-zealand/">Chile vs New Zealand: Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 7,843 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Maize (corn) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.