Which has higher maize (corn) — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2024.

What is the difference in maize (corn) — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?

33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP

Belarus

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belarus rank

53rd

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

50th

Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time

Belarus
Bosnia and Herzegovina

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 53rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th of 148 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher maize (corn) — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in maize (corn) — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for maize (corn) — area harvested, per unit of gdp?: Belarus ranks 53rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-area-harvested-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/maize-corn-area-harvested-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 149 places, 7,746 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Maize (corn) — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.