Jordan vs Saint Lucia: Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per capita
Jordan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Saint Lucia
0 ha per person
in 1980
Jordan rank
143rd
Saint Lucia rank
143rd
Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 143rd of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher maize (corn) — area harvested, per capita, Jordan or Saint Lucia?
- Jordan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in maize (corn) — area harvested, per capita between Jordan and Saint Lucia?
- 0 ha per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Saint Lucia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1980.
- How do Jordan and Saint Lucia rank globally for maize (corn) — area harvested, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 143rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Maize (corn) — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Maize (corn) — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.