How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs New Caledonia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Malta

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta rank

123rd

New Caledonia rank

125th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Malta
New Caledonia

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 123rd and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 135 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Malta or New Caledonia?: Malta, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Malta and New Caledonia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Malta ranks 123rd and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Caledonia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/malta/new-caledonia/">Malta vs New Caledonia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,363 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.