How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Italy?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Italy: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Italy

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Iceland rank

101st

Italy rank

102nd

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Iceland
Italy

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 101st and Italy ranks 102nd of 135 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Iceland or Italy?: Iceland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Iceland and Italy?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Italy?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Italy rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Iceland ranks 101st and Italy ranks 102nd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Italy: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/italy/">Iceland vs Italy: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,363 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.