How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and World?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs World: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Chad

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

World

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chad rank

3rd

World rank

1st

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

Chad
World

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 10.2 times World's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 3rd and World ranks 1st of 135 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	World	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0006 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1970s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1980s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1990s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2000s	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2010s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Chad or World?: Chad, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Chad and World?: 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and World?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and World rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?: Chad ranks 3rd and World ranks 1st of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs World: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/world/">Chad vs World: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,363 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.