Rwanda vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)

Rwanda
16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
57th
Thailand rank
59th

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Thailand
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre against 15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.88 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.

Rwanda ranks 57th and Thailand ranks 59th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 1.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 2.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 4.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 5.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.58 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 9.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.96 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 18.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 17.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), Rwanda or Thailand?
Rwanda, at 16.22 1000 USD per square kilometre against 15.34 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) between Rwanda and Thailand?
0.88 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Thailand rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
Rwanda ranks 57th and Thailand ranks 59th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/livestock-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/thailand/">Rwanda vs Thailand: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.